Commentary on Husserl's Logical Investigations
By Jeremy Hausotter
This Commentary on the Logical Investigations is the fruit of my rereading of Edmund Husserl's Logical Investigations and discussing it with a friend of mine. My desire in writing this is to codify my notes and place them somewhere accessible. This series makes no pretensions at being academic. In fact, academic resources will be rarely cited, if at all.
The Commentary follows the J.N. Findlay translation, Humanity Books, 2000. All citations come from this edition.
Prolegomena: Chapter 2
In this essay we examine Chapter 2 of the Prolegomena. In this chapter Husserl investigates the meaning of normativity, the forms of normative propositions, and how normative disciplines and practical disciplines require a theoretical discipline for its essential foundation.
Prolegomena: Chapter 3
In chapter 3 Husserl outlines the historical debate between the psychologistic interpretation of logic and its opponents. Husserl concludes from this discussion that psychology cannot bring us to the essence of logic, and so it cannot serve as the theoretical foundation for logic.
Prolegomena: Chapter 5
In chapter 5 Husserl analyzes the consequences of applying the psychologistic interpretation of logic to the law of noncontradiction, arguing that this interpretation does not lead us to the reality of the law itself.
Prolegomena: Chapter 6
In this installment of our commentary on Husserl's Logical Investigations we explore two distinctions Husserl makes. He distinguishes between psychological and ideal incompatibility, and also between felt and real irrefragability.
Looking Down Yosemite Valley, California by Albert Bierstadt